| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H410M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200810 |
| Uptime | 4.8 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '23 at 23:10 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | CHL-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-10400-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
84%
Excellent
|
79% 135 Pts
|
72% 595 Pts
|
59% 951 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 2595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43%
Average
|
43% 54.6 fps
|
42% 52.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 388 104 436 75 387 MB/s
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
87% 386 MB/s
|
126% 49.4 MB/s
|
85% 174 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
903GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 186 185 187 187 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
116% 158 MB/s
|
231% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65%
Good
|
63% 22.2 GB/s
|
65% 22.8 GB/s
|
56% 71.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H410M-HDV Builds (Compare 837 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 200x |
| Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 165x |
| Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples | 162x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 60x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 55x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $328 |