Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '23 at 22:45
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.9% Above average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 112 50% 81.7 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 393 36% 301 Pts	64-Core 634 39% 634 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69% Good	Lighting 84 Reflection 96.5 Parallax 87 68% 89.2 fps	MRender 83.6 Gravity 86.7 Splatting 85.9 70% 85.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE2512GTTDR 512GB 5,250 User benchmarks, average bench 211% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 912 Write 452 Mixed 1,051 179% 805 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 35.9 118% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 462 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 354 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 290%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 194GB free Firmware: CC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 108 Write 110 Mixed 72 72% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 537GB free Firmware: CC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 190 Write 176 Mixed 66.9 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 501GB free Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 17.9 Write 34.7 Mixed 21.2 18% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$123 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4TB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 99.9 Write 131 Mixed 63.9 73% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.7 217% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4.5TB free Firmware: FP1R Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 15.2 Write 51.9 Mixed 15.4 20% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB 6,646 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 4TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 155 Write 150 Mixed 99.6 168% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 4x8GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 34.6 100% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 25.8 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	484x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD $210Bench 84%, 294,959 samples	160x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	92x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	88x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	46x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)