PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130128 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Feb 01 '23 at 22:03 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.86
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 304 274 280 281 240 MB/s
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
234GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 131 131 134 133 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
259GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 160 161 160 161 164 MB/s
|
85.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
626GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 99 99 100 99 100 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
107GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 106 103 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 109x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 62x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 46x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |