Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	52.3% Above average	Memory 74.5 1-Core 59.8 2-Core 99.8 50% 78 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 202 24% 187 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	8.66% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 8.5 Parallax 14.3 9% 11.1 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 10.9 Splatting 9.3 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.66% Great: 9%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 388 Write 377 Mixed 305 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 28.9 95% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 131 99% 132 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 111GB free Firmware: CC46 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 157 Write 115 Mixed 69.2 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 100GB free Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 132 Write 130 Mixed 74.8 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.2 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $517

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16