Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 65.6 2-Core 155 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 255 32% 245 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% EVGA(3842 2670) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 32.6 Parallax 42.4 0% 25.1 fps	MRender 44.5 Gravity 34.7 Splatting 32.6 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HX240GSSDSATA3 240GB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 12 0.2 0.8 0.7 0.7 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 407 Write 24.6 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 6 25% 118 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 3.2 9% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 88%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 341GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 61 62 61 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 73.7 Write 84.1 Mixed 59.4 SusWrite 61.5 52% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 11.3 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16