Samsung 500T8A/500S8A/500T9A/500S9A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Samsung 500T8A/500S8A/500T9A/500S9A (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG DM500T9A-A58C
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '23 at 09:05
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 122 2-Core 241 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 647 72% 565 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.1% Above average	Lighting 69.7 Reflection 72.7 Parallax 67.2 57% 69.9 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 69 Splatting 65.2 55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000 256GB 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT22K0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 308 313 315 315 386 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 287 Write 264 Mixed 228 SusWrite 332 63% 278 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 28.9 85% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 320 227% 285 MB/s

Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 570GB free Firmware: MS2OA8A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 56 54 55 75 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 109 Write 118 Mixed 31 SusWrite 67.3 59% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 8.1 9.6 8.9 9.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 62.4 Write 14.7 Mixed 15 SusWrite 12.1 27% 26 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 42% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE M378A1K43EB2-CWE 16GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 22.1 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 24.5 70% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 500T8A/500S8A/500T9A/500S9A Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

System: Samsung 500T8A/500S8A/500T9A/500S9A

CPU
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	10x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	4x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	3x

SSD
MZNLN256HAJQ-000 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 268 samples	5x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 251 samples	2x
Extreme 120GBSanDisk $160Bench 69%, 11,787 samples	1x

RAM
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	3x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	2x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $277

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16