| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds) |
| Memory | 23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200701 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '23 at 08:28 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.2%
Excellent
|
88% 159 Pts
|
82% 686 Pts
|
84% 1,354 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
214%
Outstanding
|
257% 314 fps
|
213% 271 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 363 370 363 362 354 MB/s
|
88.6%
Excellent
|
85% 378 MB/s
|
119% 43.6 MB/s
|
135% 191 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
103GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 130 129 130 129 MB/s
|
77.9%
Very good
|
93% 126 MB/s
|
242% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65%
Good
|
64% 22.3 GB/s
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
49% 81.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 4,640x |
| Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 4,263x |
| Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 3,409x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 2,234x |
| RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 2,072x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,466x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $929 |