Samsung 400T8A/400S8A/400T9A/400S9A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Samsung 400T8A/400S8A/400T9A/400S9A (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_DT_DB400T8A
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191209
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '23 at 04:55
Run Duration	106 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 433 56% 425 Pts	64-Core 411 26% 411 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Lighting 63.4 Reflection 59.6 Parallax 81.2 52% 68.1 fps	MRender 61.6 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 45.1 47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP74 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 56 58 64 66 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 70.2 Write 64 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 59.4 45% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8RT 2x8GB 215 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.4% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 23.1 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 22.2 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 400T8A/400S8A/400T9A/400S9A Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Samsung 400T8A/400S8A/400T9A/400S9A

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	26x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	6x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	5x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples	7x

SSD
MZNLN256HAJQ-000 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 268 samples	5x
MTFDDAK128MAY-1AH1ZABHA 128GBCrucialBench 83%, 1,012 samples	2x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	2x

RAM
CB8GU2666.C8RT 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 166 samples	4x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,085 samples	3x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16