Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 278%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 341%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics283% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory48.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 22:22
Run Duration411 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 75.1
1-Core 179
2-Core 353
106% 203 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,368
122% 1,031 Pts
64-Core 2,733
169% 2,733 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$720
Zotac(19DA 2688) ≥ 4GB; ZOTAC GAMING GEFORCE RTX 4080 16GB TRINITY OC 256BIT GDDR6X
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
283% Outstanding
Lighting 418
Reflection 412
Parallax 406
341% 412 fps
MRender 542
Gravity 364
Splatting 263
304% 390 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 283%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 288
Mixed 136
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 28.2
114% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 145
127% 189 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 119%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2120 2257 2497 2517 2497 2514 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 2,547
Mixed 2,367
SusWrite 2,400
554% 2,458 MB/s
4K Read 74.9
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 83.7
296% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1448
DQ Write 1,176
DQ Mixed 1,267
961% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 397%
Great: 431%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
189GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 726 738 768 760 757 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
847GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1799 1764 1809 1790 1835 1828 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,202
Write 1,188
Mixed 1,615
SusWrite 1804
381% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 89.6
279% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,456
DQ Write 1,195
DQ Mixed 1,274
968% 1,308 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 345%
Great: 435%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
259GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 87 85 87 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 56.2
Write 65.5
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 87
53% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
208% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
863GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 165 165 164 166 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 135
Write 110
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 163
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
38GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 77 82 78 78 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 37.8
Write 88.5
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 76.5
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
197% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 143 144 108 145 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 124
Mixed 73
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
21GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 78 78 78 75 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 70
Mixed 68
SusWrite 71.9
49% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
189% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
675GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 114 113 72 114 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 63.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 106
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
306GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 150 145 126 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 92
Write 117
Mixed 101
SusWrite 143
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
298% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
620GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 122 118 116 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 76.5
Write 82.5
Mixed 77
SusWrite 119
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
183% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 93%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
496GB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 101 103 105 111 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69% Good
Read 100
Write 103
Mixed 97
SusWrite 107
140% 102 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 1.9
414% 5.33 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 1.8
403% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.5% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 25.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 26.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback