Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 51.1 2-Core 103 49% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 170 21% 162 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 0403) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 5.7 5% 6.37 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 5.5 5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 5%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Rescue09rm22ar120hy 120GB 120GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: VE0R530E Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 304 Write 308 Mixed 243 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 21.6 80% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 67.8 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 110 97% 140 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 82%
SMI USB DISK 252GB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 224GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 121 Write 98.1 Mixed 96.4 131% 105 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.8 183% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB 14,844 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.1% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.8 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

RAM
99U5584-007.A00LF Adata 76.B146G.C0K0C Adata 16GBKingstonBench 36%, 4 samples	2x
4x4GBAdataBench 68%, 1,028 samples	1x
9905403-442.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,854 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16