Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 149 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 485 44% 369 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.9% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 109 Parallax 124 97% 117 fps	MRender 177 Gravity 119 Splatting 102 105% 133 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GB 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: M603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 362 360 372 379 386 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 388 Write 374 Mixed 299 SusWrite 363 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 33.2 114% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 244 209% 308 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 14GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 425 Write 393 Mixed 357 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 46.5 151% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 353 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB 2,795 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 114GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 41 38 37 39 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 144 Write 64.3 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 41.4 89% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.2 112% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	84% Excellent	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 30 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 20.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 120%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	740x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16