| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190515 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 30 '23 at 17:24 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
90% 165 Pts
|
86% 725 Pts
|
93% 1,505 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
103%
Outstanding
|
106% 139 fps
|
101% 123 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 78 18 9.4 12 22 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
60% 270 MB/s
|
48% 16.7 MB/s
|
37% 73.8 MB/s
|
|
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82A7T92C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1628 1653 1673 1678 1214 544 MB/s
|
268%
Outstanding
|
387% 1,722 MB/s
|
190% 72.6 MB/s
|
710% 947 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
321GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 101 97 100 101 MB/s
|
54.3%
Above average
|
54% 74.4 MB/s
|
108% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown BL16G30C15U4B.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
89% 31 GB/s
|
79% 27.8 GB/s
|
55% 72.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,380 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,203x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 510x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 486x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 295x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 276x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 236x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $560 |