Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200114
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 18:12
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 284
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 985
92% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,361
84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Asus(1043 880A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Lighting 324
Reflection 287
Parallax 368
264% 326 fps
MRender 359
Gravity 261
Splatting 185
210% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 217%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101200RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,885
Write 1,932
Mixed 1,773
417% 1,863 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 60.3
226% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,359
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 1,200
909% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 191% Great: 337%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 363
Write 359
Mixed 338
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 47.5
147% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 219
163% 217 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
863GB free
Firmware: 101200RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,912
Write 2,189
Mixed 1,799
440% 1,967 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 70.7
246% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,472
DQ Write 1107
DQ Mixed 1,166
905% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 191% Great: 337%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 24.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 161%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 162%


EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback