Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4030U 24,177 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 48.4 2-Core 66.4 39% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 66.3 8-Core 67 9% 66.7 Pts	64-Core 69.5 4% 69.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 54%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT63L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 44 46 44 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 417 Write 43.1 Mixed 69.1 SusWrite 45.5 31% 144 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 19.6 4K Mixed 15.1 57% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 17.2 DQ Mixed 35.8 40% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB 30,873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 12.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 11.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	40x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	33x
HD Graphics Family (PHDGD Skylake v2.9)IntelBench 3%, 81 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 2,338 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	5x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples	4x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16