Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '23 at 00:06
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 48.2 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 155 55% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 459 43% 360 Pts	64-Core 525 32% 525 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Lighting 12.2 Reflection 109 Parallax 23.5 10% 48.2 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 14.1 11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 90 58 57 60 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 937 Write 710 Mixed 624 SusWrite 121 133% 598 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 61.3 4K Mixed 37.1 126% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 222 202% 305 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB 48,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.6% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	120	15.5"	1536 864	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	414x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	44x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	248x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	185x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	24x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $69Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	145x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	127x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	46x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	58x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	43x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $69

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320	Nvidia RTX 3060 $350	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12600K $194	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16