Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '23 at 22:10
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$153 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 198 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 300 38% 291 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$323 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 143 Parallax 132 107% 136 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 136 Splatting 118 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Spark 256GB 1,848 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 20 76 54 14 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 426 Write 264 Mixed 294 SusWrite 40.1 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 23.9 103% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 2.6 53% 130 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$44 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 514GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 95.3 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 87.4 65% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB 5,670 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.3% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 21.6 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 21.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	33%	3	216	59	60	72.3"	3840 2160	SNY4B04 SONY TV *00

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $170Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	115x
Core i5-6500Intel $153Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	100x
Core i3-6100Intel $105Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $120Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	75x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $130Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $17Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	15x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	13x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $307

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320	Nvidia RTX 3060 $350	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12600K $194	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $158	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16