PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A88-M (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130501 |
Uptime | 16.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 28 '23 at 20:55 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 93 120 123 123 127 MB/s
|
53%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$89
472GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 123 125 125 127 MB/s
|
68.3%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
87GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 83 85 85 82 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 17x |
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 12x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |