PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080911 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 28 '23 at 16:14 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | TWN-User |
Background CPU | 55% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core2 Quad Q9500
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
39.7%
Below average
|
39% 62.1 Pts
|
18% 139 Pts
|
10% 156 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.5%
Poor
|
28% 34.3 fps
|
25% 31.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston A400 480GB-$26
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKQ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 122 146 122 128 129 MB/s
|
40.2%
Average
|
38% 171 MB/s
|
62% 21.2 MB/s
|
78% 111 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
181GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 89 88 91 90 MB/s
|
69.7%
Good
|
85% 115 MB/s
|
197% 1.47 MB/s
|
|
![]() Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 112 112 118 117 MB/s
|
70.2%
Very good
|
78% 107 MB/s
|
241% 1.67 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
17% 6.03 GB/s
|
14% 4.93 GB/s
|
29% 138 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 59 | 46 | 60 | 18.5" | 1280 720 | BNQ7896 BenQ GL950A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $85Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 31x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 13x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $28Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 12x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 10x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $80Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $117 |