Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 4.67 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 148 33% 72.3 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 107 25% 166 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3FB5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.91% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 6.5 6% 6.17 fps	MRender 7.3 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 0.1 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.91% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8L 512GB 8,016 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: C04C SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 36 65 46 48 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 287 Write 73.4 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 60.9 27% 126 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 8.1 35% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 44.7 DQ Mixed 87.1 64% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 189%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	34% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.4 SC Mixed 0.5 1% 0.33 GB/s	Latency 456 9% 456 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	2,183x
Iris Plus G4IntelBench 6%, 12,263 samples	138x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	133x

SSD
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GBBench 143%, 4,825 samples	276x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	228x
PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 129%, 5,242 samples	194x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 65%, 2,729 samples	449x
HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBHynixBench 67%, 1,560 samples	246x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	177x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16