Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 13:23
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$199
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 572
60% 478 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$189
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 89.4
54% 72.4 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 46.5
48% 60.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$78
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 573
Write 509
Mixed 543
121% 542 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 55.6
178% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 603
451% 605 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 364%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$45
60GB free
Firmware: 00RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 431
Write 274
Mixed 210
67% 305 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 30.9
117% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 24.4
93% 209 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
24GB free
Firmware: D6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 405
Write 354
Mixed 114
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 29
110% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 111
131% 228 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
25GB free
Firmware: 1H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 67.7
Write 75.9
Mixed 56.8
50% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$73
1TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40% Average
Read 61.4
Write 70.2
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 78.2
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40%
Great: 63%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
67GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 51.2
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 52.3
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 51%
Corsair Voyager Mini 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 1a0c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 57.7
Write 32.5
Mixed 8.5
35% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
72% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 34%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 40.2
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 20.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 70 27" 1280 720 IVM661F PL2783Q
Typical GA-X99-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $802
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $224Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $153Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback