Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 248%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 302%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics236% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 14:54
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$335
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 71.7
1-Core 203
2-Core 395
115% 223 Pts
4-Core 766
8-Core 1,470
133% 1,118 Pts
64-Core 2,832
175% 2,832 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB; Sapphire Vapor-x AMD Radeon RX7900 XTX
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.1.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
236% Outstanding
Lighting 298
Reflection 417
Parallax 659
243% 458 fps
MRender 460
Gravity 289
Splatting 426
323% 392 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 236%
Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1153 775 743 731 706 707 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2544
Write 1,831
Mixed 1,736
SusWrite 803
385% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 108
369% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 2,000
DQ Write 1,607
DQ Mixed 1,747
1,323% 1,785 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 345%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
59GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 226 83 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 368
Write 401
Mixed 342
SusWrite 157
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 46.5
163% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 224
168% 224 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 121%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$45
133GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 1064 641 172 77 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,051
Write 1,075
Mixed 992
SusWrite 513
204% 908 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 82
320% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 1105
DQ Mixed 512
460% 670 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 204%
Great: 253%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 155 154 172 138 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 146
Write 110
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 152
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3FD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 91 89 80 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 83.5
Write 91.9
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 88.1
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 5U6000C4016G-B 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
126% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 48.1
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 23.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 126%
Great: 194%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 6,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,163
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback