Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory38.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 05:10
Run Duration485 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 940
90% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 47.4
39% 52.9 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 53.1
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2935 1804 1786 1783 1811 1799 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,753
Write 3,233
Mixed 2,976
SusWrite 1,986
618% 2,737 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 98.6
326% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 863
645% 861 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 371%
Great: 488%
Wd_black SN750 2TB
148GB free
Firmware: 112000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2182 1361 893 868 852 747 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,919
Write 2,197
Mixed 1,762
SusWrite 1,150
396% 1,757 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 65.3
226% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,069
DQ Write 619
DQ Mixed 899
654% 863 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 254%
Great: 347%
Wd_black SN750 2TB
222GB free
Firmware: 112000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 955 953 677 653 616 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,907
Write 941
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 796
267% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 64
219% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,079
DQ Write 751
DQ Mixed 908
680% 913 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 233%
Great: 347%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
271GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 115 117 114 124 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 80.3
Write 159
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 121
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
263% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58%
Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
29GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 71 73 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 67.1
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 72.3
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
129GB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 148 148 161 138 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 160
Write 165
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 151
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
181% 2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 121%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
870GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 97 96 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 62.2
Write 54.1
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 94.4
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
510GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 13.8
22% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
33GB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 174 206 168 120 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 197
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 163
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 121%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
7GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 104 117 100 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 78.9
Write 99
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 98.8
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
168GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 98 95 100 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 77.5
Write 113
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 96.9
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
677GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 36.7
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 13.9
22% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
149% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 69%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 68 69 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 68.3
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
123GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 60 63 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 25.9
Mixed 27
SusWrite 61.3
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
212% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 9.5 8.6 11 10 8.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 159
Write 12.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 9.2
33% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
54% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 25E1 4TB
910GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 71 75 74 71 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 72.1
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 74.7
98% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 64GB
1GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.1
Write 17.2
Mixed 10.2
23% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.5
149% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 28%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
159GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 49.8
Write 36.6
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 13.3
40% 32 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 30
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 27.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,807
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback