Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	38.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220512
Uptime	11.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '23 at 05:10
Run Duration	485 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$285 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 75.3 1-Core 141 2-Core 280 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 940 90% 740 Pts	64-Core 1,368 85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.8% Average	Lighting 48.3 Reflection 63.1 Parallax 47.4 39% 52.9 fps	MRender 58.3 Gravity 60.5 Splatting 53.1 46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 206,100 User benchmarks, average bench 386% 394GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2935 1804 1786 1783 1811 1799 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	371% Outstanding	Read 2,753 Write 3,233 Mixed 2,976 SusWrite 1,986 618% 2,737 MB/s	4K Read 76 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 98.6 326% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 975 DQ Write 745 DQ Mixed 863 645% 861 MB/s
Poor: 251% ↑ This bench: 371% Great: 478%
Wd_black SN750 2TB 3,702 User benchmarks, average bench 281% 148GB free Firmware: 112000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 2182 1361 893 868 852 747 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	254% Outstanding	Read 1,919 Write 2,197 Mixed 1,762 SusWrite 1,150 396% 1,757 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 65.3 226% 83.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,069 DQ Write 619 DQ Mixed 899 654% 863 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 254% Great: 354%
Wd_black SN750 2TB 3,702 User benchmarks, average bench 281% 222GB free Firmware: 112000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 955 953 677 653 616 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 1,907 Write 941 Mixed 1,170 SusWrite 796 267% 1,203 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 64 219% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,079 DQ Write 751 DQ Mixed 908 680% 913 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 354%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 271GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 115 117 114 124 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 80.3 Write 159 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 121 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 263% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$62 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 29GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 71 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 67.1 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 72.3 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 96%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 129GB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 148 148 161 138 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 160 Write 165 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 151 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.5 181% 2 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 121%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$62 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 870GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 97 96 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 62.2 Write 54.1 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 94.4 48% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 96%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 510GB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 37.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 13.8 22% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 150% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 33GB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 174 206 168 120 183 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 197 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 163 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 214% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 121%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$79 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 104 117 100 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 78.9 Write 99 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 98.8 62% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 100%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 168GB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 98 95 100 96 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 77.5 Write 113 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 96.9 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 677GB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 36.7 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 13.9 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 149% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 69%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$79 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 68 69 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 146 Write 140 Mixed 91.1 SusWrite 68.3 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 100%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 123GB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 60 63 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 69.5 Write 25.9 Mixed 27 SusWrite 61.3 34% 45.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.4 212% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 9.5 8.6 11 10 8.2 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 159 Write 12.7 Mixed 2 SusWrite 9.2 33% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 54% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 69%
WD My Passport 25E1 4TB 827 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 910GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 71 75 74 71 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 69.7 Write 72.1 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 74.7 98% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 64GB 1,787 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 36.1 Write 17.2 Mixed 10.2 23% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.5 149% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 28%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 159GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 49.8 Write 36.6 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 13.3 40% 32 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 78% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 4x16GB 3,923 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.1% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 30 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 27.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	39	6	60	27"	1920 995	ACR0694 VG270

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 4,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 193%

UFO

Desktop 107%

UFO

Workstation 213%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $473

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $300Bench 104%, 239,758 samples	1,013x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $490Bench 104%, 85,275 samples	769x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	763x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $735Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	525x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $815Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	481x
RTX 3090Nvidia $835Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	429x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $80Bench 386%, 206,100 samples	422x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $60Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	279x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 432%, 66,370 samples	177x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	241x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	137x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $1,588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420	Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060 $350	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $153	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $41	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16