Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 40 1-Core 61.9 2-Core 110 40% 70.7 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 142 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 11E6) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 15.2 Reflection 8.9 Parallax 15.6 12% 13.2 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 17 Splatting 15.4 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB 8,401 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 40 42 45 46 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32% Below average	Read 297 Write 203 Mixed 228 SusWrite 46.5 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 10.8 53% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 39.2 DQ Mixed 21.7 19% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0- BLS4G3D18ADS3 6GB 1333, 1866 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 5 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	79x
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples	29x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	28x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	11x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $32

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16