PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Oegstone MS-7788 (all builds) |
Motherboard | MSI H61M-P31 (G3) (MS-7788) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120830 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jan 26 '23 at 02:00 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
57.8%
Above average
|
62% 110 Pts
|
38% 291 Pts
|
18% 295 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 580-$150
CLim: 1239 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.9%
Above average
|
54% 70.6 fps
|
48% 60.8 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Puskill 128GB 128GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200619
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 201 194 228 145 59 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
47% 208 MB/s
|
72% 26.2 MB/s
|
49% 106 MB/s
|
![]() |
48.9%
Average
|
66% 88.7 MB/s
|
163% 1.27 MB/s
|
|
![]() Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$25
264GB free
Firmware: K2AOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
30% 40.5 MB/s
|
120% 0.7 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown DDR3 1600G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
49.1%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 2 | 144 | 50 | 75 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | HPN3545 HP 24f |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $50Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 30x |
Core i7-2600Intel $165Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 17x |
Core i5-2400Intel $20Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 15x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $120Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 16x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $188 |