HP 810-109

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 5 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP 810-109  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory10.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140210
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 01:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 222
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 579
62% 491 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.08
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
8.63% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 13.5
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 13
Splatting 10.4
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.63%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC8110D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 376 390 348 404 405 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 450
Write 399
Mixed 234
SusWrite 382
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 27.6
97% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 181
166% 257 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
160GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 97 99 98 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 136
Write 131
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 97.5
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Ramaxel RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-109 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: HP 810-109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $120
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback