Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 days ago, 4 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '23 at 17:32
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$220 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 75.8 1-Core 144 2-Core 288 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 944 92% 757 Pts	64-Core 1421 88% 1421 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$429 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 870E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 113 Parallax 129 103% 123 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 111 Splatting 105 104% 132 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 351 Write 372 Mixed 270 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 33.3 142% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 143 154% 255 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$37 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 143GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 258 256 264 266 265 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 489 Write 241 Mixed 238 SusWrite 244 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 34.8 132% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 190 154% 219 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$38 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 161GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 122 90 89 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 129 Write 108 Mixed 26 SusWrite 104 66% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GIS 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 27.9 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 28.2 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	23.5"	1920 1080	ACR0604 Acer KG241Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 8,830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $63

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $215Bench 73%, 446,215 samples	1,097x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $93Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	956x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	817x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $120Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	755x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	588x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	496x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $18Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	542x
A400 480GBKingston $26Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	239x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $41Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	225x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $49Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	173x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $81Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	159x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $465

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $319	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $448	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i3-12100F $98	Nvidia RTX 3070 $568	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $163	Nvidia RTX 3050 $298	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16