Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

14 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095 1,699 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 53.9 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 144 51% 90 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 265 35% 262 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1E50 800F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.7 2% 3.8 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 0.3 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ngff 2280 256GB SSD 574 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0510A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 177 15 72 42 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 406 Write 351 Mixed 338 SusWrite 75.9 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 14.6 75% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 0.2 58% 134 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.6% Above average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21.1 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 15.3 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	196x
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	174x
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	4x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	200x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	174x

RAM
DDR4 NB 8G 2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 50%, 169 samples	93x
DDR4 NB 8G 2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 33%, 240 samples	57x
AZ8G4SW266-8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 37 samples	31x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16