PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C91 |
Motherboard | MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) (all builds) |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz |
Display | 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210114 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Jan 25 '23 at 14:01 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
98.1%
Outstanding
|
103% 192 Pts
|
97% 798 Pts
|
84% 1,364 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$448
EVGA(3842 3663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
123%
Outstanding
|
138% 158 fps
|
111% 139 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
598GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 396 432 436 429 430 MB/s
|
92.3%
Outstanding
|
89% 394 MB/s
|
121% 50 MB/s
|
224% 307 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 468 465 465 461 464 MB/s
|
121%
Outstanding
|
102% 452 MB/s
|
183% 65.5 MB/s
|
280% 374 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
86.3%
Excellent
|
88% 30.8 GB/s
|
77% 27 GB/s
|
54% 73.6 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27% | 22% | 50 | 565 | 470 | 100 | 48.8" | 1280 720 | SAM0F9C C49RG9x |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $167Bench 96%, 206,018 samples | 1,450x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $230Bench 98%, 148,645 samples | 808x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $220Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 455x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $568Bench 148%, 562,666 samples | 534x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $448Bench 129%, 322,253 samples | 388x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $360Bench 100%, 301,333 samples | 380x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $1,116 |