PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Samsung Samsung DeskTop System (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080911 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 25 '23 at 12:58 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | LKA-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
32.7%
Below average
|
32% 54 Pts
|
19% 140 Pts
|
8% 133 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Sanyo(144D 8097) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
2.19%
Terrible
|
2% 2.73 fps
|
2% 2.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() WDS120G2G0A-00JH30 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 67 69 70 40 8.2 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
28% 128 MB/s
|
70% 24.5 MB/s
|
22% 40.7 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
181GB free
Firmware: 1AC01114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 68 71 70 41 8.5 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
55% 74.3 MB/s
|
181% 1.3 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
204GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 76 76 78 78 78 MB/s
|
55.7%
Above average
|
48% 65.3 MB/s
|
157% 1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
9% 3.3 GB/s
|
10% 3.47 GB/s
|
20% 200 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 62 | 43 | 70 | 0" | 1296 768 | Default |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $50Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 146x |
Core i5-2400Intel $20Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 134x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $28Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 75x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 179x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 70x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $68 |