Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 days ago, 2 days ago.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0 50 User benchmarks, average bench 62% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 79 1-Core 51.9 2-Core 88 48% 73 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 256 26% 211 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M 12,745 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sony(104D 90AB) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 4.5 4% 3.6 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 3.7 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 4,479 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA16.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 368 Write 232 Mixed 289 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 29.8 110% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 204 169% 242 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 103%
Usb3.0 External Device 750GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 53GB free Firmware: 1A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 69.7 Write 24.6 Mixed 26.7 30% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	46.2% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	58	41	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO45EC

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16