Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 03:45
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 123
58% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 358
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2884) 3GB
CLim: 1484 MHz, MLim: 1762 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 11.5
7% 7.43 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 68.3
44% 50.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 59%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 372 351 388 390 383 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 393
Write 404
Mixed 287
SusWrite 375
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 33.1
114% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 159
130% 183 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 238GB
222GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 390 382 381 412 376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 361
Write 417
Mixed 301
SusWrite 379
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 28.3
97% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 243
188% 259 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 19.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 29: 3R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 23% 39 209 46 60 24" 1920 1080 ACR0312 S241HL
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $723
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $460Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12600K $233Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback