Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 03:44
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$255
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 762
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,269
78% 1,269 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$289
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.6% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 140
Parallax 186
100% 149 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 141
Splatting 93.6
94% 117 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 105%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 955 889 886 868 862 854 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,325
Write 1,534
Mixed 1,529
SusWrite 886
349% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 71.1
229% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 718
542% 730 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 251%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
710GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 369 366 367 372 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 415
Mixed 425
SusWrite 369
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 42.5
138% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 204
153% 206 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
354GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 162 159 164 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 161
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
2TB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 161
Write 110
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 114
146% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 35.5
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 30
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 51: 6R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 19% 79 325 15 72 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 19,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,125
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $460Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12600K $233Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback