Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 01:30
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 768
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,291
80% 1,291 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 142
Parallax 178
97% 146 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 136
Splatting 95
94% 117 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 873 882 899 882 859 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,310
Write 1,620
Mixed 1,583
SusWrite 886
357% 1,600 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 72
231% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 845
DQ Write 654
DQ Mixed 731
552% 743 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 252%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
710GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 357 364 374 373 377 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 428
Mixed 413
SusWrite 366
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 42.8
140% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
354GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 161 162 156 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 139
Write 151
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 159
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
257% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
2TB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 113 113 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 139
Write 108
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 112
142% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
165% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 35.6
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $914
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback