Samsung 700T

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 700T (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 700T
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110826
Uptime	65.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '17 at 09:16
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	72%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2467M 4,235 User benchmarks, average bench 45% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14% Very poor	Memory 20.1 1-Core 19.2 2-Core 30.4 14% 23.2 Pts	4-Core 46.1 8-Core 46 6% 46 Pts	64-Core 44.9 3% 44.9 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C0BE) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.72 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.96 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPA064HMDR-00000 64GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM1701Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 918 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1948 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B2) Unknown 76 76 240 (BE) vendor-specific 49 34 51 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51	29.9% Poor	Read 233 Write 165 Mixed 144 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 8.28 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 6.68 30% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 38.9 DQ Write 27.2 DQ Mixed 6.87 12% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ81UG8BAS0-DJ-F 1x4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 1.6 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 320 12% 320 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700T Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700T

CPU
Core i5-2467MIntelBench 45%, 4,235 samples	27x
Core i5-2537MIntelBench 44%, 490 samples	4x
Core i3-2367MIntelBench 42%, 2,143 samples	1x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	32x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	1x

SSD
MZMPA064HMDR-00000 64GBSamsungBench 32%, 111 samples	12x
MZMPA128HMFU-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 32%, 908 samples	8x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	5x

RAM
1x4GBElpidaBench 28%, 3,874 samples	28x
1x2GBSamsungBench 15%, 580 samples	2x
1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 4,437 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16