MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210205
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 06:08
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$388
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 231
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 864
78% 657 Pts
64-Core 2,224
138% 2,224 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 147
Parallax 484
105% 253 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 198
Splatting 315
239% 291 fps
Poor: 178%
This bench: 140%
Great: 208%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 593 708 636 791 787 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 2,148
Write 795
Mixed 635
SusWrite 694
234% 1,068 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 35.6
118% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 88.5
DQ Mixed 44.4
38% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 168%
Great: 355%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
389GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 1126 988 988 989 997 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 2,140
Write 1,860
Mixed 160
SusWrite 1,045
289% 1,301 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 43.3
139% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 54.2
43% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 196%
Great: 370%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$55
171GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 78.1
Write 80
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 81.2
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 57%
Lacie P9233 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 181 179 171 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 106
Write 122
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 173
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
306% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$57
692GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 143 143 146 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 69.4
Write 72
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 144
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 11.7
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 12 120 42.5" 1280 720 AUS43E1 ASUS XG438
Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $224Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $153Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback