Emachines eME642

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemEmachines eME642  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines eME642
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '17 at 14:02
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon II P340-$50
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 82.1
40% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 82.2
8-Core 82.6
11% 82.4 Pts
64-Core 82.7
6% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Acer(1025 0489) 256MB
Driver: atiu9pag.dll Ver. 8.713.3.3000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.1
0% 2 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.7
0% 1.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.25%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 38%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical eME642 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Emachines eME642

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $50
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $368Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback