Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 1,646 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 53.6 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 188 62% 113 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 675 62% 522 Pts	64-Core 1,837 114% 1,837 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Lighting 77.1 Reflection 78.1 Parallax 68.2 63% 74.5 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 73.4 59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128 128GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9H0Q Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 378 Write 133 Mixed 215 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 11.4 69% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 20.4 34% 62 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-100.A00LF 9965516-001.B00LF 9965516-100.A00LF 9965516-100.A00LF 32GB 1600, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44% Average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.2 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16