Acer Predator PT715-51-70TP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PT715-51-70TP  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Falcon_KLS
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 13:01
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 183
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 434
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Acer(1025 123E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 124
Parallax 104
80% 109 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 108
Splatting 104
86% 105 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 85%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 1405 1546 1675 1678 1673 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,884
Write 1,673
Mixed 910
SusWrite 1,506
386% 1,744 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 45.5
151% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 741
DQ Mixed 690
541% 748 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 289%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 24.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback