Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '17 at 04:09
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 75 1-Core 114 2-Core 227 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 806 76% 631 Pts	64-Core 1,255 78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8472) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Lighting 32.6 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 37.7 27% 33.2 fps	MRender 40 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 32.2 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 752GB free Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13181 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 220 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 15 (AE) Unknown 100 100 81 (B4) Unknown 0 0 10498 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 53 201864642595 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 18658831133 (F7) Unknown 100 100 586831622 (F8) Unknown 100 100 470019923	84.7% Excellent	Read 516 Write 403 Mixed 187 81% 369 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 23.3 105% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 31.4 64% 131 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 104%
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-533 480GB 961 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 444GB free Firmware: CS111101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2523 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 185 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 36 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 100 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 558 (C4) Reallocation count 98 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 107 (E7) Temperature 100 100 35 (E9) Unknown 0 0 93 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2187 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1673	85.7% Excellent	Read 413 Write 399 Mixed 357 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 31.7 113% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 74.1 97% 173 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 98%
Nvme PLEXTOR PX-256M8 256GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,848 Write 876 Mixed 1,041 276% 1,255 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 57.6 230% 87.2 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 157 165% 272 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 205%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6870 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 260 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 8861 (0A) Spinup retry count 105 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 131 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 59 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 39 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6564 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159478821 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 88 88 4841 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 633 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 176 7858 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2208 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10443 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 198 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 46 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19634 (C2) HDA temperature 117 109 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71% Very good	Read 120 Write 128 Mixed 103 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.28 111% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 175 7883 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4191 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20853 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 434 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 129 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 38656 (C2) HDA temperature 117 105 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	67.6% Good	Read 118 Write 117 Mixed 77.5 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.26 99% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 87%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 118 Write 85.7 Mixed 33.2 90% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.08 40% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 59%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 354GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 27.2 Mixed 21.8 35% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.24 70% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 1,048 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 29.4 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 24.3 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)