Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H170 PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170801
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '17 at 18:42
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 112 2-Core 212 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 420 57% 424 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65% Good	Lighting 82.9 Reflection 82.3 Parallax 71.7 68% 79 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 74.4 Splatting 73.1 60% 73.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 12552 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3708 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1848 (64) Unknown 100 100 11712288 (65) Unknown 100 100 1310048 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 97 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 89 89 3519 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1343 (B7) Unknown 97 97 30 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 100 176094511130 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 12552 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 12552 (E7) Temperature 91 91 9 (E9) Unknown 100 100 21068 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7360 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12945 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9515 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 12552	60.4% Good	Read 486 Write 165 Mixed 129 56% 260 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 9.92 76% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 23 66% 146 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 88%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 748GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896764086 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 651 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1841 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 650 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3321 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3321 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 176094969884 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	92.5% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 154 Mixed 155 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.22 101% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 107%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-00HXZT1 500GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 390GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 33.3 Mixed 16.9 35% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.12 42% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67 46,617 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	75.5% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 23 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 23 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	449x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	362x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	327x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	230x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	210x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	185x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	135x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	70x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	122x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	90x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $667

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16