Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sure Cantiga & ICH9M Chipset (all builds)
Motherboard	Sure MONTEVINA BOARD
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090520
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 16:24
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5800 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 70 1-Core 23 2-Core 44.6 34% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 44.7 8-Core 44.3 6% 44.5 Pts	64-Core 44.9 3% 44.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(1991 1001) 780MB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.42 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.49 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.61 0% 0.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM251JI 250GB 908 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2SS00_01 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 49.3 Write 53.2 Mixed 48.8 38% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.33 66% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 65GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 19% null MHz 65535, 2048 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16