Dell Vostro 460

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Dell Vostro 460 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0Y2MRG
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111017
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 08:15
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 185 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 461 48% 388 Pts	64-Core 437 27% 437 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 40 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 37.3 33% 36.1 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 36 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1735 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 202 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 51 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 18 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6630845644	97.6% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 471 Mixed 461 107% 481 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 36.4 138% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 103 86% 124 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 32GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 27570 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 368 (B1) Unknown 88 88 416 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 49 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 69 (F1) Unknown 99 99 91578639200	72.3% Very good	Read 518 Write 285 Mixed 238 76% 347 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 17.3 90% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 64.2 77% 137 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 44GB free Firmware: JC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 205128040 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1296 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 416909781 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 35987 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1179 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 8590328831 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 70 53 554958878 (C2) HDA temperature 30 47 64424509470 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 21 205128040 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1223 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -84245783471763 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4104711475 (F2) Unknown 100 253 909227280	39.2% Below average	Read 69.3 Write 67 Mixed 63.8 50% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.56 119% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG Samsung M378B5273BH1-CH9 Samsung M378B5273BH1-CH9 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16.4 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Vostro 460 Builds (Compare 511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 460

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	208x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	181x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	85x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	107x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x

RAM
99U5584-007.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 46%, 119 samples	6x
NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 44%, 1,579 samples	6x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16