MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 20:11
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 244
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 796
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,237
77% 1,237 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 226
Parallax 359
155% 258 fps
MRender 349
Gravity 157
Splatting 293
219% 266 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 161%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Digifast ACE Series 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 223 186 192 181 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 985
Write 1,176
Mixed 988
SusWrite 246
191% 849 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.8
218% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 221
253% 441 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 147%
Great: 211%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
5GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 415
Mixed 402
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 47
159% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 297
245% 351 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
74GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,600
Write 1,934
Mixed 1,621
385% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 67
220% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 890
671% 902 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
90GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 87 85 86 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 88.7
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 86.9
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 62%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
57GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 86.3
73% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 117 116 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 100
Write 127
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 111
65% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 24.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 19.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback