Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 105% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory	250.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170310
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 02:35
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 352 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 59.9 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 155 55% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 631 56% 473 Pts	64-Core 2,904 180% 2,904 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 182 Parallax 174 125% 170 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 174 Splatting 124 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 706 Write 633 Mixed 666 149% 668 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 30.2 104% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 54.9 DQ Mixed 19.2 60% 138 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 354%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193 568 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 223GB free Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4152765 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 20976620275495 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2726 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 297 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 78 60134653979 (C2) HDA temperature 27 78 60134653979 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4152765 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4152765 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4152765 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2271 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2204 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2204 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4397	59.6% Above average	Read 509 Write 166 Mixed 212 64% 296 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 14 73% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 43 66% 126 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 91%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 111GB free Firmware: 8EV101F0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	557% Outstanding	Read 2,924 Write 71.1 Mixed 138 218% 1,045 MB/s	4K Read 1,085 4K Write 4.26 4K Mixed 4.29 1,652% 365 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 557% Great: 230%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 629GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 252 218 7400 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4957 (05) Reallocated sector count 185 185 115 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 24885 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 832 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 395 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4943 (C2) HDA temperature 112 100 38 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 26 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59% Above average	Read 113 Write 92.7 Mixed 91.5 74% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.51 118% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 16x16GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 16 of 16 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.7% Poor	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 8 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.6 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	22x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	21x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	18x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16