User System

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141024
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 00:16
Run Duration	707 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 218 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 577 62% 491 Pts	64-Core 580 36% 580 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.79% Terrible	Lighting 8.47 Reflection 8.88 Parallax 10.7 7% 9.34 fps	MRender 7.95 Gravity 7.57 Splatting 8.39 6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 480GB-$192 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 442GB free Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 6132 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 839 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 34 (A8) Unknown 100 100 11 (A9) Unknown 100 100 664 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 202 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 78 145 622770913302 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 270 (F1) Unknown 253 253 172 (F2) Unknown 253 253 174 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	89.3% Excellent	Read 466 Write 388 Mixed 441 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 26.9 112% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 64.8 110% 216 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 110%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 172 6391 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2564 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1868 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 454 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 180 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7887 (C2) HDA temperature 125 116 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.5% Very good	Read 136 Write 113 Mixed 109 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.26 96% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: HP33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 63161600 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2032 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 112107296860 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7474 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1085 (B4) Unknown 100 100 31311675 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 833761574941 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 424 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 11538 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 -140737488355299 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	79.6% Very good	Read 145 Write 133 Mixed 120 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.28 75% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 114%
WD My Book 1235 4TB 2,399 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2.5TB free, PID 1235 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 30 Write 20.3 Mixed 21.8 29% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.28 65% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 59%
WD My Book 1235 4TB 2,399 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2TB free, PID 1235 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 20.9 Mixed 23.8 30% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.23 65% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 28GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 12.8 Mixed 18.7 24% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.85 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 1.21 129% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 38%
Generic Flash Disk 64GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 16GB free, PID 6998 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	4.21% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 5.98 Mixed 8.07 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 3% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.21% Great: 5%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 7GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 14 Mixed 19 25% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 1.46 136% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 7GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 31 Write 15.2 Mixed 19.9 26% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.86 4K Write 2.51 4K Mixed 1.3 144% 2.56 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 6GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 14.1 Mixed 18.8 25% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.22 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 1.49 138% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 35%
Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 16GB-$18 459 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 5GB free, PID a205 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 17.5 Mixed 18.3 26% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.11 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.34 37% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 12.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)