Asrock P55M Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock P55M Pro (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '17 at 21:47
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70% Good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 169 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 299 37% 283 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3973) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.3% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 63.9 53% 64.3 fps	MRender 57.8 Gravity 59.7 Splatting 50.8 45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 13 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 82 5370 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 4000 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 30686 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4250 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 159 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 59 176094642208 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 16 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4307	28.6% Poor	Read 35.8 Write 63.8 Mixed 56 39% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.08 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.19 43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 77%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 73GB free Firmware: 2AR20003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 17 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 4457 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7472 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12007 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 63 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2030 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 57 201864642598 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1649 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 63 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 72 72 292475	43.1% Average	Read 77.5 Write 73.1 Mixed 77.3 57% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.21 4K Mixed 0.14 25% 0.16 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 59%
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 193GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 36GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.4% Below average	Read 50.1 Write 73.7 Mixed 60 46% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.14 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 64%
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 75GB 11GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.2% Average	Read 79.2 Write 78.7 Mixed 60.3 54% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.08 17% 0.14 MB/s

Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 78GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 29.3 Mixed 30.5 39% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.63 4K Mixed 0.3 33% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 0, 0, 0 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P55M Pro Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P55M Pro

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	21x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	15x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	13x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	4x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	4x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	4x
X25-M 160GBIntelBench 36%, 7,078 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	17x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	15x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $151

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16