Asus X99-M WS/SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS/SE  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '17 at 15:41
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 190
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 737
72% 592 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 71
Parallax 63.4
60% 69.2 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 57
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 501
Write 470
Mixed 467
107% 479 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 25.3
98% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 43
75% 143 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
393GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 57.4
Mixed 51.2
42% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.27
82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 63%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
219GB free
Firmware: SM14 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 75
Write 102
Mixed 87.1
66% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 5.32
4K Mixed 0.51
174% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51%
Great: 64%
Intenso Rainbow Line 16GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 5.53
Mixed 5.2
11% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.64
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
17% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 21
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback