Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H170-Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit색,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170307
Uptime	13.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '22 at 00:56
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$132 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 211 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 305 38% 288 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 47.2 Parallax 41.9 37% 44.8 fps	MRender 34.7 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 37.4 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 160 169 164 168 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 397 Write 372 Mixed 329 SusWrite 189 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 44.9 140% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 337 252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65 6,111 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 356GB free Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 347 352 296 321 311 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 323 Write 369 Mixed 278 SusWrite 325 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 29.4 95% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 295 226% 307 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 104%
Samsung 470 Series SSD 64GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 33GB free Firmware: AXM09B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 163 165 170 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 203 Write 161 Mixed 141 SusWrite 164 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 14.5 55% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 34.4 DQ Mixed 20.4 30% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	64.8% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 22.8 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 20.3 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	50x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	49x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	41x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	32x

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $323

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16