Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '22 at 07:09
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11370H 12,227 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 73.8 1-Core 153 2-Core 272 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 696 72% 581 Pts	64-Core 693 43% 693 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 29.6 21% 27.9 fps	MRender 23.1 Gravity 33.6 Splatting 21.6 21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3575 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.7% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 164 Parallax 110 92% 129 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 91.7 Splatting 84 80% 99.4 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850X 1000GB 459 User benchmarks, average bench 444% 789GB free (System drive) Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1552 1581 1590 1259 1482 1408 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	271% Outstanding	Read 1,959 Write 1,638 Mixed 1,592 SusWrite 1,479 375% 1,667 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 68.5 233% 82.8 MB/s	DQ Read 992 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 637 482% 664 MB/s
Poor: 244% ↑ This bench: 271% Great: 615%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 7,990 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 477GB free Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1448 1456 1415 288 385 386 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,192 Write 1,198 Mixed 1,172 SusWrite 896 251% 1,115 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 51.2 171% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 932 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 641 475% 643 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 253%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 931GB free, PID 0718 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 29 30 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.3% Poor	Read 26.9 Write 29.6 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 30.1 40% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 7.8 410% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB 1,322 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 22.4 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 17.9 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 70%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples	462x
Gen Intel Core i7-11370H11thBench 79%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	232x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	230x
RTX 3080Nvidia $870Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	220x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	94x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 257%, 7,746 samples	85x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GBMicronBench 70%, 1,322 samples	115x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GBMicronBench 67%, 5,644 samples	108x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	100x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $54	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16