Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 07:09
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 153
2-Core 272
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 696
72% 581 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 29.6
21% 27.9 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 21.6
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3575 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 164
Parallax 110
92% 129 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 91.7
Splatting 84
80% 99.4 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850X 1000GB
789GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1552 1581 1590 1259 1482 1408 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,959
Write 1,638
Mixed 1,592
SusWrite 1,479
375% 1,667 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 68.5
233% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 637
482% 664 MB/s
Poor: 255%
This bench: 271%
Great: 613%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1448 1456 1415 288 385 386 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,192
Write 1,198
Mixed 1,172
SusWrite 896
251% 1,115 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 51.2
171% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 641
475% 643 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 184%
Great: 253%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB
931GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 29 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.3% Poor
Read 26.9
Write 29.6
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 30.1
40% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 7.8
410% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 22.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 17.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback