Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '17 at 18:15
Run Duration373 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 56.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 201
65% 121 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 491
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.8% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 52.9
45% 56.3 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 52
Splatting 47.7
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 400
Mixed 409
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 25.1
140% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 42.3
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 24.9
57% 110 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 153
Write 143
Mixed 137
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.26
102% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
192GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 111
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.25
120% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 109%
Flash Drive AU_USB20 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Read 15.1
Write 5.74
Mixed 8.05
11% 9.64 MB/s
4K Read 6.12
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
24% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 6%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
0GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 42
Write 15.5
Mixed 19.9
28% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.68
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.33
52% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $493
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback